1 of 3 contract terms missed. Meta’s SAM 3.1 boxed every “drink can” in all 276 frames; Meta’s Muse Spark rejected 1 look-alike, so nothing counted.
“drink can” found 1 object, none the product, so Muse Spark suggested “can”, and SAM still found nothing. See each search
Pay or hold · a recommendation, you decide
Nothing here moves money; you pay as you normally do.
Muse Spark with tools · you approve anything sent
No password needed on this example report. It reads the stored results; nothing is sent to the creator. Approving a re-cut link needs the demo password.
Aldo's Reel missed on product visibility — the can was on screen for 0 s vs 3 s required, and the readable can said Pamplemousse instead of Strawberry Peach. I've drafted a plain-language fix note and queued a re-cut request, with payout set to hold. Both are waiting for your approval — nothing has been sent and no money moved.
Agent’s call: hold · Product not on screen long enough (0 s vs 3 s required) and visible can was Pamplemousse, not Strawberry Peach
Waiting for you: a re-cut request
On-screen time missed (0 s, needs 3 s) and wrong flavor visible (Pamplemousse vs Strawberry Peach)
Unlock to approveAnyone with the link can view this report and its proof clip.
Select a term to play its proof.
Boxes on the video come from SAM 3.1 tracking “drink can”. Dashed red was rejected by Muse Spark as a look-alike.
0.0sLaCroix was never confirmed on screen.
SAM 3.1 tracked them; Muse Spark checked each against the brief. Look-alikes it rejected and objects it could not make out are shown for transparency and never count.

Heard by Muse Voice Transcribe. Select one to hear it.
Whether the video says it is an ad: heard by Muse Voice Transcribe, or read on screen by Muse Spark in up to 10 sampled frames (#ad, “Sponsored”, #partner).
Analyzed 276 frames at 15 fps · Every Meta API call, $0.220 · How accurate is this?
SAM 3.1 is billed per frame ($0.20 per 1,000); Muse Spark and Voice Transcribe count the fixed amount the budget reserves per call ($0.02 / $0.01), not the billed amount.
Measured frame by frame on 11 test Reels as delivered, against labels a person checked: precision 98.4%, recall 91.1%. Precision is the share of the seconds Screen-Time counted that really showed the product; recall is the share of the seconds the product really showed that it counted.
A test campaign run by Screen-Time with friends, who agreed to be shown. Not affiliated with, sponsored or endorsed by LaCroix or Poppi; their names and cans belong to their owners.